it makes me wonder just how much some forums have to do with some services. i have posted some negative things about different services at different forums (all from my tracks or monitoring services). if posters disagree i don't care (who knows who they are or might work for), but when mods defend the service with a record from the service's site or say not to post about the service, it makes me wonder about their motives. i know some services are sponsors here, this bothers me, but at least the site is up front about it. this even applies to "free" posters that mislead people that are protected at some forums (i will give bc credit for cleaning things up there, but it shouldn't have taken a year or two).
after a lot of people said i should have used lines when dr bob's plays were released (in my track), even dr bob admitted in a article about his service that he knows people can't get the line he posts because books change it within minutes of the release. next year i am looking forward to tracking his plays from their release, not having to go back months, and see how he does.
|